Features of the third edition include:
I love Internet law, and since the day I started teaching it, I’ve tried to share my enthusiasm with my students. The third edition of the casebook is the culmination of six years of work. I designed it from the ground up to help law students thrive in the face of the constant ferment of the Internet itself. Internet Law: Cases and Problems combines clear organization, classic cases, and a focus on the doctrinal fundamentals with challenging questions and problems that bring students face-to-face with the challenges facing the Internet and Internet lawyers today.
Thanks to Semaphore Press and its innovative business model, I’m pleased to be able to offer Internet Law: Cases and Problems for a fraction of the price of a major-label casebook. Semaphore casebooks are sold as PDF downloads. There’s no DRM, so you can read the book and annotate it on your computer in your regular PDF reader, copy it to your portable device to read on the go, and print out as much or as little of the book as you want. If your computer crashes and you need to download the book again, you’re always welcome to.
The all-digital format means we cut out the middleman and pass the savings on to you. Unlike casebooks from the major publishers, which can cost $150 or more, the suggested price for this casebook is just $30. Think of it as my contribution to keeping the price of legal education down.
Sound good? Read on for the full spiel.
When I titled this book “Internet Law: Cases and Problems,” I meant it. Most sections of the book have one or more problems applying the material from the cases to real-life situations. Are you ready to outwit a child pornographer, lobby Congress, draft a website’s terms of service, catch a hacker, and help a company recover from a disastrous bug? By the time you finish this casebook, you will be.
Internet law doesn’t sit still for a moment. Neither does this casebook. In it, you’ll find ripped-from-the-headlines coverage of ongoing controversies, including the Copyright Alert system, extradition, network neutrality, and the use of Facebook evidence in court. If it’s not in Internet Law: Cases and Problems, it hasn’t happened yet.
If you’re looking for the classics of the Internet Law canon, don’t worry. ACLU v. Reno, ProCD v. Zeidenberg, Zeran v. AOL, and many of your other favorites are invited to the party, too. But I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised when you see who’s sitting next to whom and what they have to say to each other.
Each section in the casebook examines a small set of closely related issues: for example, how courts have applied the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to computers, or the successes and failures of the different legal theories used to assert trademark rights over domain names. Each chapter pulls together a set of related sections to examine a single area of law (e.g. privacy or copyright) in appropriate depth. Each section and chapter follows a natural progression from foundations to applications. Five running themes — code is law, governmental control, private power, generativity, and online equality — tie the book together, emphasizing what these topics have in common.
Learning to be a good lawyer is hard. It doesn’t need to be unnecessarily hard. In assembling this casebook, wherever possible I picked cases that confront commonly recurring issues, whose reasoning is clear and straighforward, and whose holdings have been followed by other courts. Next, I edited the cases ruthlessly to take out everything but the good bits, and followed them with clear questions to direct attention to the most important issues they raise. Then I wrote introductory primers on topics like how computers and the Internet work, the basics of the First Amendment, and the history of telecommunications regulation. The book doesn’t throw students into the deep end, but it does help them get there quickly on their own.
Studying Internet law can and should be fun. Most of the cases feature highly memorable facts. You’ll meet rogue graduate students, copyright scofflaws, spammers, scammers, and entrepreneurs of all shapes and sizes. Many of the questions draw on your personal experiences with the Internet (and see if you can spot all of the cultural references in the names in the problems). Throughout the book, I’ve done my best to make the tone engaging and accessible, even when discussing technical subjects.
Full table of contents
How does this “suggested price” PDF download thing work?
Semaphore has pages explaining the deal in more detail for students and professors. I hope you will agree that it’s a fair shake for all involved.
How do I adopt the book for my class?
Since the book is distributed as a PDF, there’s no need to have a book order in to your school’s bookstore months in advance. Just tell us you’re using the book, direct your students to Semaphore’s website, and you’re good to go.
Is there a teacher’s manual?
Sure is. It includes teaching suggestions for every case, brief answers to every question, and discussion of the issues raised in every problem, plus a sample syllabus, deleted scenes, and a blooper reel. If you’d like to see it, just email me for a copy.
Will the book be updated?
I teach Internet Law annually, and I’m committed to keeping the book fresh and up-to-date. Online publication means we can push out new editions with impunity. Expect detailed updates and improvements every summer.
Where has the book been adopted?
Internet Law: Cases and Problems has been used or is scheduled to be used in courses at:
I’m a law student and my professor isn’t assigning Internet Law: Cases and Problems. What should I do?
Open your eyes as wide as possible, and ask your professor to switch books in your most endearing voice.
No, seriously, there are other good casebooks on the subject. Your professor may have chosen one of them because its approach more closely fits the way he or she teaches. You might consider using Internet Law: Cases and Problems as a supplement for self-study, though: the $30 suggested price means that it costs less than many hornboks and commercial outlines (and there aren’t many of them for Internet law to begin with).
I’m not a law student. Is this book right for me?
I hope so. The larger issues the book engages with should be of interest to anyone who cares about the Internet, and “the law” can be surprisingly accessible to non-lawyers. I’ve tried to tell interesting stories while being informative about how legal issues play out online.
Fair warning: it will probably be tougher going for you than for a law student, since you won’t have had the same practice reading judicial opinions, and some of the questions will refer to concepts taught in the first year of law school. Still, I hope you will give the book a try. If you do, I would love to hear from you about the experience; please let me know how I can make it more accessible and useful for a broad audience.
I found a mistake in the book. What should I do?
Oh, noes! Please email me so I can improve the next edition.
I have a suggestion for the book. What should I do?
Hooray! Please email me so I can improve the next edition.
How can I find out more?
If you still have unanswered questions, just email me.
James Grimmelmann is a Professor of Law at the University of Maryland. He has degrees in computer science and in law, and has worked as a computer programmer. As a lawyer and technologist, he aims to help these two groups speak intelligibly to each other. He is the author of numerous academic papers on topics such as search engines, privacy, virtual worlds, Internet history, and the Google Books lawsuit. He has been blogging at laboratorium.net since 2000.